6.
Systems Within Systems
Never ending spirals

The picture in today's lesson is an example of a Fractal. A
simple way to consider it is that fractals are to geometry what fractions are
to numbers. A number such as 1/3 when calculated as an exact number, is
0.33333.... It is an unending repeated decimal. Some, such as Pi, are an
unending decimal with different numbers that are also without end. This means
that no one can ever know the absolute value of Pi. The picture above is a
never ending graphic image that can be forever magnified and will never come to
a final end. Until computers came along, these things we call fractals, could
only be visualized in the mind of a mathematician. Now we are all able to enjoy
their incredible beauty. What you see in the picture is just one of an
unlimited possibility of different systems (equations), each in themselves, -
unlimited.
When we started this series on hermeneutic considerations, we concluded that
even though we are able to be aware of systems other than our own, we are very
much limited in what we can know about them. In fact, we can only know anything
about them because we are able to access what comes from them. (That is, we do
not join with that other system, we only receive something from that other
system, such as reflected light.)
Now, the containing system we are all in (-this universe, which also includes
other galaxies) cannot communicate with others. Despite bold attempts at
science fiction or "testimonies of ghostly appearances", or religious
experiences, nothing scientifically verifiable has passed from one universe to
another. So - we have no experience of things like time travel, or entering
into another parallel universe. Just because all of this is systems within
systems doesn't mean there cannot be an Absolute beyond our universe. This is a
philosophical question at this point.
If an Absolute breaks through into our universe, either as an observer, a
participant, or even Creator, it must be initiated by that Absolute. [Only the
Absolute has the knowledge of what systems exist.] Christians believe the
Absolute has done just that. (This is seen in the present debate about
"Intelligent Design".) There is also evidence of this from what is
contained within our universe (called Natural Revelation by theologians), from
messages and words claimed to come from the place of the Absolute. (called
Special Revelation), -and even a visitation of the Absolute Himself. (termed
Incarnational Revelation). We are still stuck, however, in that whatever
"is here" is still another system within our system, and limited
accordingly. It cannot be absolute. The only way we can truly know this
absolute is that it must become a part of our own personal system, - our own
self! For some, this only introduces another set of withins in ourselves
that can continue down that unending spiral. Again, where it all ends must be
at the discretion of the Absolute. From our part, our best response would be
openness on a holistic level.
Several lessons ago we looked at Psalm 19. Go back and, this time, read the
opening paragraphs to see what some of these words say about what we have been
dealing with here.
7. The Hermeneutic
Circle

In this lesson we
will pick up from our last teaching on spirals, loops, and circles. The picture
above is an optical illusion. The point here is that this is a stationary
image that appears to move and shimmer as one looks at it. Obviously, the
movement is only a perception within the mind of the observer and appears as it
does as a result of nerve processing within both the eye and the brain. This
process is not at all independent of other senses entering the brain, and
“automatically” adjusts over time to accommodate a common understanding of what
is thought of as being “reality”. (NOTE: special inverting
glasses worn by an observer will, over some hours, become adjusted by the brain
to cause vision to again appear normal and not inverted at all).
So within the physical being there are mechanisms at work to establish what we
call objective truth. Objectivity is arrived at by confirmation from all of our
senses and by other people outside of own subjective world. Objectivity is the
result of merging subjective input from other systems, assuming an appearance
of commonness or universality. If all of these inputs line up, then we are ready
to assign objectivity to the particular observation. Optical illusions occur
when there are conflicting data. The picture above appears to be moving, but
our other knowledge contradicts that conclusion. Objectivity is not necessarily
an actual truthful representation of something as much as it is a perceived
assigned concept derived from subjective data. If some information were to be
missing, what we would think as being objective might be far from it. (the
picture above looks 3 dimensional, but our touch does not confirm it) This can
occur not only with sight, but also with words. (words being a sort of,
packaged thoughts. In some data communications these are even called “packets”,
which are groupings of words or data. Linguistically,
called morphemes, the smallest linguistic unit that has semantic meaning).
If objectivity is determined by a plurality of observers, we find from our
prior page on “The Place of Absolute Truth” that every observer is at a different place, so we can, at
best, only come up with a consensus, not a unanimous conclusion. If we attempt
to bring in communities from historical places we are even going to be skewed
backward toward the sun moving around the earth. Among Evangelicals there
exists an extremely pressing need to have some sort of reliable objective stake
driven into solid ground somewhere, otherwise there is fear that total subjectivity and
relativity will dilute and delete the Scriptures completely. This is especially
true when we consider a popular concept among theologians called the
“Hermeneutic Circle”.
The Hermeneutic Circle is a concept that arises from the situation where we
need to interpret the meaning of the words from the meaning of the whole, while
we can only interpret the meaning of the whole from our understanding of the
words. This is a kind of hermeneutic “catch 22”. Not only is it hard to
“break” into that circle, it is continually changing. One author has even
referred to it as a spiral, for it not only circles, but proceeds out into
another place. Again, some external objective reference becomes a necessity for
most to feel comfortable. Often an acceptable consideration involves
grammatical and linguistic analysis to provide such an anchor. (exegesis)
We end this page with a thought similar to our last study. For a number of
reasons, we relentlessly have insisted that our reference must be objective
and external, which complicates and splinters most all approaches. In the
next lesson we will look at the possibility that the answer might be subjective
and internal. For now, this is a paradigm shift that even the most
adventuresome quickly draw back from.
8. IT IS BEGINNING
When
anyone writes it is almost always for some purpose, either to communicate with
another, or even in order to speak to one's self in a different time or
"frame of mind". Some write as a release, as observers listening as
their own thoughts take form and meaning in their expression. As Christians we
believe that Scriptures are a unique genre and are inspired from God.
Questions that ultimately must be worked through are just what we mean
by the use of our word inspiration. Are Scriptures infallible or do they
contain errors? Are they pure, exactly as God decreed, or are they mixed with
the culture and humanity of the author? To ask these questions is not an issue
of unbelief or hostility toward truth, but the contrary. Wisdom knows that
truth is not cheap or casual, and so a careful and serious application of our
redeemed mind is called for.
Another question that continually confronts us is how we can know anything at
all. (Epistemology) There are at least two categories of knowledge that are
outside of our own being that we are called to deal with in
hermeneutics; those that are objective, and "other minds". That which
is objective is discernible and able to be confirmed to a great degree by other
independent observers. Even though an exact duplication is impossible because
of differences within each observer and the necessary differing perspectives,
enough commonality usually enables all to agree on an external reality. Words
are such things and exegesis is the tool used to handle them. Because thinking
in others' minds is mainly from its own self-conscious understanding, even the
authorial intent is no guarantee that its expression is exactly true to that
intent.
The expressions we are considering here are words; written objective containers
of the original thoughts. Even if they are considered as objectively perfect in
their expression, the process of our observation immediately contaminates their
purity with our own subjectivity. Working through this (contextualization*) is
not necessarily, as some might contend, an attack upon the truth of the words
themselves, but is required to know that truth as accurately as we can.
It is
impossible for us to contain any absolutely inerrant knowledge in our mind that
has passed through the objective stage. All such knowledge is incomplete
and mixed with our own context. There is only one way out of this problem, and
for Christians, the answer has always been there.
As this is being written the Easter season is upon us. Today is Good Friday,
and from the cross a declaration echoed across the ages, "It is
finished!" Jesus' death and its accomplishments were completed; but Easter
is about resurrection. When he rose from the dead, we who have entered into an
eternal relationship with him share in that resurrection and its power, even
now. (Col 3:1-3)
Our
very minds and spirit are supernaturally changed and we become a transformed
container for a "direct deposit" of the Absolute to break
through into our subjective world and continually be with us as the Spirit
of Truth - correcting, teaching, interpreting the Scripture, discerning the
world system, and revealing the heart and mind of our Father. Another
Kingdom metaphor of the Spirit comes to us: It is finished/it is beginning!
9. HERMENEUTICS AND MORE
Many
of the lessons presented have been philosophical and scientific without much
substance in the spiritual realm. This is because we must remember that hermeneutics
is a tool, and not a formula or an end in itself. Much of what we have
presented has been to establish that in order for us to deal with Scripture, we
must consider what it is (our presuppositions) and how we are able to work with
words, thinking and information, linguistics and cultural elements.
We
must remember that these things are primarily neither spiritual nor necessarily
religious. These are activities that take place in the natural world and the
physical aspects of our thought processes. There is much more required to come
to the knowledge of the truth of the Scriptures, and hermeneutics is only the
first part, and not the entire process, as has been traditionally held by some
Evangelicals. (A major human failing among lesser theologians is that they have
the final word and understanding on an issue.) The definition of hermeneutic is
not fixed and has been even questioned if exegesis (grammatical and linguistic
analysis) is a part or a separate function.
I have used a common diagram as a help to visualize the entire process of
interacting with Scripture. It is based on two concentric circles, where the
center one represents the spiritual "inner man", and the outer, the
physical body. I consider the area between the two circles to be a transitional
continuum, which I will call the mind. Some refer to it as a soul, which is not
immediately relevant for our discussion here.
Exegesis would involve the outermost circle of the body, which using its
senses, is the observer. It also involves the physical part of the mind which
is common to all mankind. Somewhere in the mind the transition into a more
subjective activity occurs. Here, the result begins to become greater than
its bodily sensory information.
To
see notes relating to the diagram below click here.
10. REVELATION REQUIRES RESPONSE
The
Eye of God Nebula

This
is an actual photograph by the Hubble Space Telescope of the Planetary Helix
Nebula NGC 7293 which is about 300 to 650 light years away.
Before we begin I need to make
several comments: The previous material concerning dimensions and systems
relate to the thinking in the early 18th Century, often called Positivism or
Empiricism. Although there have been modifications, this philosophy has
dominated much of the modern world and is partially responsible for the chaotic
condition of our present cultures. I also wish to point out that the graphic we
introduced last session is only a limited spatial aid to visualize some
relationships.
As
Christians, we have received writings from our history which were compiled into
our Bible almost several thousand years ago. Originally in oral form, these
scriptures tell of the story of the Absolute, not only breaking into our world,
but creating all systems. The “Absolute” has revealed Himself in numerous ways
to different cultures, through His creation, through individuals who have
written as He has directed them, and He has revealed Himself subjectively
within the people He created, and continues to do so.
He most significantly
revealed Himself by sending His son, who is His image made visible in this
world. And lastly, He has sent His Spirit to live within those whom He has
chosen to continually provide subjective knowledge of his will and presence.
How then do we know what this means and what is truth? These questions show why
the Church has developed this tool.
Hermeneutics is considered a science and art developed in order to interpret
the Scriptures. (Today other disciplines now
have their own systems of hermeneutics) Although people have always
tried to make sense of their world, and specifically for us, the Bible -
hermeneutics is a formal attempt to develop an academic tool that is able to
establish the truth and meaning of scriptures.
This
again brings us into one of the circles where the tool itself ends up
determining the interpretation. How can we avoid this and be absolutely
objective? We cannot. This is one of the reasons why God sent His spirit to
live within us, for only the Holy Spirit (of truth) is able accomplish that.
What evidence do we have that even the Holy Spirit can and will do this? Faith
– which is the subjective substance of his reality and presence – which is the
confirmation of our presupposition of His desire to communicate with us. The
Bible describes this as, “His Spirit bears witness with our spirit”(Rom 8:16).
This is why some popular teachers call this a “leap of faith”.
You cannot just walk
into that circle. Those who try to provide a logical and scientific doorway are
doomed to failure. They can lead you along a good path up to the edge, but beyond
that is a leap. God likes faith, because at the root of it is trust. Those who
trust Him are not disappointed.
Trusting God sounds good for most people, but
their question is, “Did God say…..?”. (Does that sound familiar?) According to
Scripture, the wrong understanding and response to that question led to the
corruption of the whole universe. So it is not just interpreting God’s revealed
will that is necessary, but understanding and properly responding.
11. EXTERNALIZED HERMENEUTICS

Before
we leave these considerations about the Absolute, we need to address a little
about what is termed apologetics. We have identified ourselves as Christians
throughout these pages, but our arguments have only brought us to the place
where most all religions are. If it is agreed that there is a God, our
Absolute, how does God relate to human understanding about personality, gender,
plurality, and what an Absolute existence might be. Mankind has seemingly
imagined most possibilities and configurations from animistic spirits to Greek
and Roman deities with all too human characteristics and passions.
Which among all of these ideas and claims about gods is valid? Even the Greek
philosophers such as Plato and Socrates reasoned with great exercise of the
mind about abstract concepts of Truth and Certainty. All people could see
evidence in this physical world of something or someone greater than
themselves, and the meaning of this was expounded in thousands of stories and
myths. Most all claimed that they were the truth.
The man called Jesus came in order to, among other things, validate the Hebrew
Scriptures and represent Truth itself. Although presenting many signs and
miracles in the world, the ability of humans to know that Truth had to come
from within, and respond to its claims. In the New Testament Scriptures the
Apostle Paul engaged in such dialogue with philosophers on the famous Mar's
Hill.
The response that belief required was more than a philosophical one, but of
total deep subjective conviction. The outward evidences could only point to
that which could be known from within the heart of man. That inward revelation,
although subjective, was far more than intellectual concepts and involved the
will of man's heart.
Hermeneutics is only a part of our encounter with God's self disclosure. That
particular revelation requires a response if it is going to be more than just
an idea, and we need to get both aspects right, as they are inseparable. Mankind
has been given external evidence, natural proofs and testimonies of the truth
of the Christian God. It is his subjective decision of his will to receive or
reject it. A good description of this process has been written by Dallas
Willard, Spiritual
Disciplines, Spiritual Formation and the Restoration of the Soul,
(Journal of Psychology and Theology,
1998, Vol. 26, No. 1, 101-109)
Classically, hermeneutics has been content to mainly see an intellectual
analysis as it's mandate. Developed during the Enlightenment period of history,
it has attempted to separate itself from any devotional or subjective elements
and lean heavily upon intellect and reason. This has had good positive results
as it has exposed most of the primitive and superstitious contenders for the
truth as foolishness. In the negative, it has forgotten why it exists and like
its other theological cousins, has become an end in itself. The results have
produced generations who walked the fine line of bibliolatry, relating to
doctrines and propositional statements instead of to God.
What then is to be done with hermeneutics? While some would desire to totally
rework it, or even do away with it entirely, that would be impossible. Whether
formal, or not, it describes what transpires within the mind of men as they
contemplate the Scriptures. I purpose that our encounter with the Scriptures
should involve the elements of exegesis plus a revelational experience
involving the heart and soul, resulting in a mental and emotional commitment
with an effective decision to respond appropriately. Separating academic
hermeneutics from a devotional experience is unrealistic and artificial. The
texts were not born that way and cannot be comprehended in such a sterile
setting.
I
prefer to call this activity: externalized hermeneutics. That is, - as the reader
commits himself to respond to the implications of the Scriptures, the truth
becomes knowable in its fullest, for it is at the discretion of the Holy Spirit
to release or withhold. Formulas or procedures do not produce an automatic
revelation of the truth of Scripture. That which has been subjected
first to an adequate exegesis and interpreted with available hermeneutic tools
and principles should then be humbly presented before the Lord for illumination
and revelational knowledge from the Holy Spirit, according to His good
pleasure. Involved with this is a commitment to receive and work out any
implications or demands that the Lord would direct. That which began in God's
heart, processed through our whole being becomes externalized into the world in
which we live. It is our part of "Thy will be done on the earth as it is
in heaven."
If you "do it", you will know.
The reason is that it is the Holy Spirit who finally enables us to come to the knowledge of the
truth, and he has indicated there are conditions. As it was at the start of
this journey, even though we may be believers, we are not the ones in control
of our access to Truth.
12. MORE THAN MEETS THE EYE

In the picture - the white balls at the intersection of
the lines appear to briefly change to black. This is an optical illusion and
the picture is not changing, but the observer is seeing what is happening
within the eye as the picture is processed by the neural construction of the
eye and the brain.
These
past weeks we have been dealing with questions that most people seem to think
have little relationship with the “reality they know”. They do have a
good point because most of these philosophical matters seem to have little
effect on our lives. However, this doesn't change the fact that merely because
things are unseen doesn't mean they have no consequences, whether they are
viruses or demonic powers. Life does seem to go on in ways that we think are
explainable, usually if we are not the one’s trying to do the explaining.
Many who read the Bible usually seem perplexed at what the fuss is about. “Just
read it for what it says”, they say. “It does not take a rocket scientist to
understand, at least, the recent translations.” In the 18th century there was a
group of Christians who espoused what they called ‘common-sense’
philosophy. That certainly sounds desirable, but what one found common was not
always the same for others.
As science advanced and extended into investigating the cosmos and the quantum
world, the particular mathematical understanding of human logic soon became
obsolete, and mathematics discovered relationships that defied human reason. I
recall attempting to explain Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle to a
class by stating that a particular chair was more probably at one location,
than another place that I pointed to just a little to one side. The response
was they had uncertainty about a lot of things that day! Yet, there is a
semiconductor component called a tunnel diode, whose function depends
upon that very principle.
For the most part, we don’t need much more than traditional Newtonian Physics
to describe how to travel around the earth, but for a trip to Saturn, other
matters become relevant. Much is the same with Biblical Interpretation; most of
the Scriptures are clear and understandable. Were it not for theological claims
of inerrancy and absolute truth, ventures like we have just come through would
not be so pressing. Remember that the Bible itself reminds us that we do not
look at what is visible. Seeing the invisible is not a simple matter!
Colossians 1:15-17 He is the image of the
invisible God, the firstborn of all creation. For by Him all things were
created, both in the heavens and on earth, visible and invisible, whether
thrones or dominions or rulers or authorities-- all things have been created
through Him and for Him. He is before all things, and in Him all things hold
together.
Hebrews 11:3 By faith we understand that the worlds were
prepared by the word of God, so that what is seen was not made out of things
which are visible.
2 Corinthians 4:18 -we look not at the things which are
seen, but at the things which are not seen; for the things which are seen are
temporal, but the things which are not seen are eternal.
13. THE INVISIBLE
REALITY

The Scriptures from the last lesson ( Col 1:15-17; Heb
11:3; 2 Cor 4:18) are important because we are not the only ones that hold to a
reality that is invisible. One of the tenets in Postmodernism is that we
perceive reality through the lens of culture and language. Since culture and
language are far from universal (“metanarratives”), there seems to be no
possibility for any truly objective truth. The implications are that people use
what they consider as truth to develop their own world view. The consequences
of this make things that are not truth to be, even though they are not-real,
but invisible constructions of their mind; resulting in “mental
illusions” not unlike our more familiar “optical illusions”. When Jesus said to
those listening to his teachings, “Whoever has ears to hear,” he was
acknowledging that there were those in the crowd that were unable to “see” or
perceive his message. Processes within our minds work to bring into “awareness”
certain information, and filter out others.
A famous riddle is:
"A father and son were in an automobile accident.
The father was killed and when the son was taken to the hospital, the surgeon
refused to operate, saying, "I cannot operate because that boy is my
son". What are the relationships?
We
are ever relying on our spell checker, but the brain is able to ignore many
of our mistakes and fill in "what it expects to see" by familiar clues.
As an example:

Another example of the mind filtering out what is
there is shown below:
How
long did it take you to notice the extra word?
The solution to the riddle is that the surgeon was the
boy's mother, and it was her husband who had died. The filter is one of gender,
where usually a surgeon is assumed to be a man. We see things we expect to see,
and miss other information that is before us.
The task of Hermeneutics is as a tool to help us
to understand the Scriptures. If our goal is any less, we will only be
able to find surface meaning. Before we can begin to "get anything out",
we have to see what is there, and from our simple exercises above we see it
is not as easy as we usually expect. So - regardless of what hermeneutic approach
we finally employ, the first step must begin with accurate observation.
For those who casually study scripture, this seemingly simple task is often
ignored with resulting faulty conclusions. Observation becomes the universal
beginning of most all hermeneutic applications.
Although we seem crippled in our ability to overcome
these limitations, in some manner or another, individuals are responsible for
their world view, or else there exists a fatalism. Perhaps the book of
Ecclesiastes would be a good study for contemporary Christians, even though there
is nothing new under the sun.
Another, even more controversial topic is the presence
of evil in the world. That the results abound around us is undeniable, but is
it an effect from unseen forces, or is evil only defined in relative and social
contexts? We will explore this in other lessons.
Many Postmodern critics lament that reason and logic
have been abandoned and the situation seems hopeless. I would put before you
that this is not true. Unsaved and saved Postmoderns are neither stupid, nor
mutually exclusive as a group which includes Christians. Postmodernism is
a cultural expression like others, and has been around since the beginning of
man’s life outside of "The Garden".
"Some of the “old guard” might think that it was the right
hemisphere of the brain that suffered in the Adamic Fall. It may prove that in our
renewal of the mind, the other part we have neglected might well be the most
exciting and rewarding transformation yet. It helps to remember that our goal
is to be like Jesus, who for now remains unseen; but John writes.
1 John 3:1-3 See
how great a love the Father has bestowed on us, that we would be called
children of God; and such we are. For this reason the world does not know us,
because it did not know Him. Beloved, now we are children of God, and it has
not appeared as yet what we will be. We know that when He appears, we will be
like Him, because we will see Him just as He is. And everyone who has this hope
fixed on Him purifies himself, just as He is pure. NAU
Or - as The
Message puts it:
What marvelous love the Father has extended to us! Just
look at it—we’re called children of God! That’s who we really are. But that’s
also why the world doesn’t recognize us or take us seriously, because it has no
idea who he is or what he’s up to.
But friends,
that’s exactly who we are: children of God. And that’s only the beginning. Who
knows how we’ll end up! What we know is that when Christ is openly revealed,
we’ll see him—and in seeing him, become like him. All of us who look forward to
his Coming stay ready, with the glistening purity of Jesus’ life as a model for
our own.
14. A Quick
Look at the Compass


A compass
doesn't tell which way to go. It just gives the bearings. Leonard Sweet pointed
out in one of his books how maps "lie". Compasses are like that. When
working with a compass there is a term one finds called "true North",
which seems as elusive as some of our other absolutes. If you have ever attempted
to set a car compass you will find a small map included that requires you to
make an adjustment in your readings, dependent upon where you are located. If
you don't know where you are, compasses are not that helpful. Let's
take a quick look at our bearings.
1. The
problem of reality continues to perplex those working with the philosophy of
science and theology. In our metaphor of an exploring journey, one can identify
with the old children's song which goes, "--the bear came over the mountain,
and what do you think he saw? He saw another mountain, he saw another mountain
..." Philosophers, to a large part, have given up on the idea of
finding a final certainty, but still agree to pursue truth. For the mountain
pioneer this spells a certain doom regarding his finding the promised land,
but if he has a mind to enjoy the journey and keep his eyes open, many treasures
are able to be acquired along the way.
Lest the
journeying Christian become too critical of theologians for failing to give
us the final clear roadmap to our destination, we must remember that they also
are on the same quest. There are numerous discoveries many of them have made,
some at supreme personal cost. Even the Scriptures point out that we all
look at a faulty distorted image of truth. The wilderness ahead is not benign,
and acknowledged or not, there are entities within that territory that are diabolically
committed to destroy us. Many have run their ships upon the rocks and are those
who are said to be "ever learning but failing to come to the knowledge
of the truth."
2.
Another observation we must clearly keep in view is that we are not dealing
with some inanimate or lesser creature that we can assume that we sit at a place
outside of the entire system as a capable observer. Even for those who readily
admit to the necessity of acknowledging our interactive context and subjective
baggage in all of our thinking, we must be humbled before an absolute God.
(At least for theological philosophers). Many would accuse us of hiding behind
our presuppositions and faith in order to maintain our irrational authoritarian
position. But like a card player that gives his own rules to the game,
he has his own defined wild card somewhere in the deck. Whatever matrix of rationality
one has, he will always find presuppositions, even though he might deny
this.
Ours
are: First, the Absolute, who we call God, has chosen to reveal Himself to us
through His creation and the Scriptures. Secondly; that we arrive at this certainty through an
equally necessary imparted and revealed faith and presence of the Absolute as the
Holy Spirit. We have consequentially found that objective evidence that this
is the truth also resides within our world system, but not necessarily as a
philosophical proof.
3.
As we would then look into the external evidence of Scripture, we acknowledge
the necessity for continued revelation and interaction of the Holy Spirit to
enable us to come to the knowledge of the truth represented by those Scriptures.
This is all at his discretion and not as a mechanical
or methodological result of our own intention.
A common
expression among Evangelicals is that Scripture must interpret Scripture.
Although this is often stated from a naive' and simplistic understanding,
it is the only path ahead. It is not exclusive to any other directions because
we are in continual communion with the Life within. But the Scriptures have,
even from their own testimony, a unique and purposefully given place in revealing
the path of truth for our journey. Although not the end we seek up ahead,
each step of the path consists of the same substance of that place, given to
lead us onward. In forthcoming lessons we will look at how Scripture addresses these questions,
and how much baggage can we leave here, and what discovered treasures will be
valuable to take as we proceed.
15.
Being Human



These
are amazing still frames from a newly developed ultrasonic scan video camera
that takes moving pictures of the baby within the womb. Developed in Great Britain,
the web site reporting this is the BBC: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/3846525.stm
The
yawn is at 12 weeks, and the wink at 24 weeks. The video requires some "playing
with" and depends upon your download speed.
Some
years ago I was a graduate student in physics. Most of the classes were
involved with advanced mathematics, but the Physics department would not
have their students take any classes from the Mathematics Department. This
wasn't just academic tribalism, but the problem for the physicists was
that the Math department was concerned with "excessive accuracy" in their computations.
It
seems that I remember the issue was that the mathematicians were working
in an unreal world. This was more than abstractions or numbers, for we have already noted
that fractions are able to be worked with differently than decimals are. (Lesson
6). The physicists were interested in working within systems, while the mathematicians
were more fond of exploring "pure" possibilities. An equation might be made up of expressions
that involved numeric values out to tens of decimal places to be a precisely
correct solution. The response the physicists might have preferred was to take the correct equation and put "realistic numbers" into
it, and with a broad sweep, erase most of the equation as having no practical
significance. The physicists were dealing within the world system
where they were concerned with what they considered reality. They felt the same
way about the philosophers as they did the mathematicians, and the Philosophy
of Science class was not in the graduate physics curriculum. Physics was, after
all, to be about reality. These days some of the most insightful philosophers
are physicists. Most people still would put theologians into the impractical
and "other worldly" category. This should not be.
We
have seen that math means different things to different people. The price of
gasoline at the pump might say in big numbers $ 2.18 but we know
"in small print" is added 0.9 cents. For all practical purposes
the cost is $ 2.19 per gallon, but we still think $ 2.18. It has
only been embarrassingly recent that we have seen how much a seemingly
small number can affect the "practical results in the real world"
with what has been popularized as the "Butterfly
Effect".
Unless we are
trying to make bold statements about our absolute knowledge about The
Absolute, life as human beings is quite workable within our own system. This
is probably why the Church has to be continually reawakened to the exhortation
of scripture that it is our present world in which we are to be involved.
To be spiritually minded is not to always be thinking of spiritual things (other
worldly), but to be thinking about all things from a spiritual perspective.
This is one of the reasons why "sanctified" subjectivity is needed to function as a
Christian. But subjectivity itself is a mix.
It
might be thought that the audible voice of the Holy Spirit continually moderating
our daily activities would be a wonderful thing. It might be as it was when
Jesus walked with the disciples. But it is clear that they didn't always get
it right even in his presence. We still carry our mixed bag of experiences and
other interactions with our world and its effects upon us as seen through our
only too human eyes.
So
there is a reality that is common to us as humans, and one that is affected
by many things which severely skew our perception and understanding. Not only
have we seen that we cannot entirely trust what we see, as our experiments with
optical illusions demonstrated, but there are many voices and experiences that
engulf us. Some come from the community of man, and we are told from the Scriptures
that there are multitudes of other entities about us, some that are mortal enemies.
What can we trust if this is true?

Here
is why the existence of evidence commonly available to man, scriptures, and the
internal presence of the Holy Spirit of Truth are our only hope. In the Postmodern
world view, all is futile and meaningless. Man's best efforts always come up
with disappointment and that all is vanity. I would say that this conclusion is correct
and despite some valiant attempts of some of our best philosophers, it is the
conclusion we continually return to. This is why the Absolute has broken through
upon us in our world, and why He has given us the scripture and has come
to transform and live within us. All of this is necessary, and that it has been done as it
has. No other Salvation, in any other way - can be our hope and give us
meaning. The lessons ahead will continue our journey into His word and Spirit.
to
be continued